X and Fluxbox :: Status Report Intel D201GLY and DSL 4.1 (video)

mesa-6.5.2 was used to build xorg72 and gl.h was generated while building mesa.

I did not include the mesa headers in xorg72-dev because I didn't think about it at the time. Thinking about it now, the xorg72 compilation uses the mesa sources for its own purposes but does not depend on mesa directly so I'm not sure whether the mesa headers belong with xorg72-dev or not.

You could get the headers by compiling mesa-6.5.2 or, if you drop me a pm, I could send you the tarball.

If somebody who understands these things better than me could given an opinion on the subject, I could add the mesa headers (libs as well?) to xorg72-dev.

Quote

$ sudo cp -r /tmp/xorg72 /opt
$ sudo rm -r /tmp/xorg72 [optional]

Could use mv instead?

You could add them, or even create another extension (that suggests the xorg72-dev package). I call it entirely up to you, since the xorg72 package itself isn't split up.

Well, they are essential in building apps that use opengl..

Having a separate extension would allow compiling those with only base DSL.

Thank you for the Mesa tar ball, that got me passed that one.

I am now missing the drm headers. (xf86drm.h and friends). Is it normal for an x.org distro to reference XFree headers?

Mark

...and yes, libdrm-2.3.0 was used to build xorg72 and contains drm.h xf86drm.h etc - I guess I should have thought to include these with the mesa headers since mesa reuired drm to build.

I'm travelling at the moment, so I cannot double-check exactly what is compiled by libdrm for a couple of days.

Next Page...
original here.