Other Help Topics :: DSL Editions

Heh, I was going to suggest "core" as the new name, but thought it might to used too much already (i.e. in processors). "dsl-c" for short then?

Quote

There is no libc5 in tiny core.

I wonder if you meant libstdc++ v5

Quote (mikshaw @ June 17 2008,20:15)

Once this new dslcore and repository section are in place, I will likely not be involved with updating any past extensions or scripts that were designed for DSL, since dslcore is what I have been hoping for since I first found DSL. My focus will likely be on dslcore only. Of course the scripts I wrote for DSL are completely open, so anyone who wants to maintain them for DSL is welcome.

You should post a list of which scripts you currently take care of then :P

Quote (roberts @ June 17 2008,18:17)

snip

Just to avoid confusion, will there be a shell aside from the ftk/lua combo? Bash? Ash? Busybox's shell?

The other thread(s) indicated some version of ash iirc. (afaik busybox's is also some variant of this)

This thread's now turned into another... oh nevermind :P

Since it's come up and without getting too far ahead of ourselves, maybe it's time to start staking out "turf" for core extensions so we have an idea of who wants to do what. That way we have more cooperation where possible, reduce overlap of effort, get on the same page about dependency extensions, etc.

Next Page...
original here.