Quote (atermfan @ Mar. 01 2007,17:53) |
Technically speaking, if it had some kind of discriminitive FS, it would not have worked in other distros I have tried. I do not even think developers would go as far as to not make it not work in a specific distro. |
Quote | ||
Detected by Knoppix 4.0. Off topic question: Does ext2 automatically sets it to boot? Because I did not set it to boot. |
Quote | ||
Ports are USB2. Positive. I downloaded the DSL-N a few days ago. So I assumed it is the latest version (RC4). But then I went to have a second look. And found out something... This link: http://damnsmalllinux.org/ Says: "DSL-N (DSL's bigger sister) is now at 0.1RC4." But when I went to this sub-link: http://damnsmalllinux.org/dsl-n/ It says: "DSL-N 0.1RC3 is now ready" Now I am not so sure which of those links I downloaded from. I popped in the DSL-N CD again to check, but I can not find the version mentioned anywhere. The boot screen says 0.01. That is it; it does not mention which RC. I tried to find out by looking up the screenshot, but the site only offers the screenshot of the first RC. Google did not yield any results for a DSL-N screenshot. The DSL-N I got has a coast as a background. Perhaps someone would tell me if I got the RC3 or 4? It seems very odd how the main DSL site has the latest RC, while the "home page" of DSL-N still has RC3. |