mikshaw
Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004 |
|
Posted: Dec. 07 2006,11:41 |
|
Forgive me if i don't make much sense...i just woke up =o)
Grub is much more flexible than Lilo, but Lilo is much smaller and not as demanding. DSL began with Lilo only but, as with the addition of Firefox, sometimes size and speed must be sacrificed for useability. The slimmer alternatives in both cases have remained for those users who prefer not to have the extra baggage, and for cases where the larger applications just aren't suitable.
The gnu-utils package replaces many of the Busybox tools (common unix utilities) with larger yet more flexible versions.
Apt provides package management for Debian software packages.
A Linux system is built to be molded to the user's tastes, where Windows is built to run as Microsoft wants it. One result of this is that there are many ways you can do things...many ways to install software and many ways to configure the system.
At this time there is very little need for virus and malware protection in Linux. Partly because of the way linux handles file permissions and file ownership, it's very difficult for a third party to force software to run on your system without your knowledge. This may change in the future, but so far there is little sign of it happening. A firewall is probably a good idea on any system, although DSL's default setup refuses remote connections of any kind, so it's pretty safe without one until you start running services that are open to the outside (ssh, web server, etc).
I don't know what the issue with DSL 3.1 and open office would be.
-------------- http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
|