Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
 

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: How does DSL have so low RAM requirements?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
jonathantan86 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Dec. 2006
Posted: Dec. 22 2006,05:04 QUOTE

Is there any page which details what has been done to e.g. the kernel, bash, firefox etc. to reduce its hard disk usage and memory usage? For instance, if any patches have been applied, compilation options, autoconf options, what files have been removed etc.

Thank you.
Back to top
Profile PM 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: Dec. 22 2006,05:38 QUOTE

kernel -> knoppix 2.4.26 (compiled for 386 with smp)
bash -> 2.05b
firefox (various) -> gtk1 builds, 1.x - probably the heaviest app.  Will only probably be used with more memory equipped machines.

xserver -> TinyX (xvesa or xf86dev)
wm -> fluxbox

The packages page i know is quite outdated though...
Back to top
Profile PM 
jonathantan86 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Dec. 2006
Posted: Dec. 22 2006,11:12 QUOTE

That's all? No complex configuration, removal of files etc.?
Back to top
Profile PM 
mikshaw Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004
Posted: Dec. 22 2006,14:19 QUOTE

If you intend to compare DSL with some of the more commonly used distributions, you can look at those differences as being a huge factor in memory usage. Most distros use KDE or Gnome as their desktops, both of which are incredible hogs when compared to  Fluxbox. The simple fact that Firefox uses Gtk1.2 instead of Gtk2 is also a fairly big ram saver. Those distros using KDE/Gnome also tend to use the heavier Qt/Gtk2 applications as defaults. For example, Konqueror or Nautilus as the default filemanager will eat much more ram than Emelfm or Midnight Commander.

You might also consider that most other popular distros are configured to load a few (or more) daemons automatically...ssh, samba, sound manager, sendmail/postfix, and syslog are common. DSL loads nothing extra by default.


--------------
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
3 replies since Dec. 22 2006,05:04 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: How does DSL have so low RAM requirements?

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code