cmanb
  
 
  
 
 
Group: Members 
Posts: 95 
Joined: Dec. 2005 | 
  | 
Posted: May 04 2006,18:27 | 
   | 
 
 
  
| Quote (pr0f3550r @ May 04 2006,10:00) |  So:
  - .dsl is when you build from debs and .uci when you build from sources?
  - can you build .uci from .debs?
  - If so, why not obsolete .dsl's and promote only .uci's?
  - If so, why the .uci extensions intead of .tar.gz?
  - Don't you think .uci resemble, in some misterious ways, the Slackware package? |  
  Other people know a lot more about this than I do, so correct me if I'm wrong, but ...
  - If so, why not obsolete .dsl's and promote only .uci's?
  UCIs are very carefully contained under /opt by being mounted as a device.  They are usually not "installed" at all.  They are mostly Read-Only.
  DSLs install, I believe, system wide.  Or at least wider than a UCI will.  They are also "installed", in the traditional sense that files are written to the system.  (Is it in loading a DSL that mkwritable is run?)
  - If so, why the .uci extensions intead of .tar.gz?
  For the same reasons listed above:  UCIs are easly loaded (mounted), contained under /opt, can be unmounted, and are Read-Only.  tar.gzs are none of these things.
  - .dsl is when you build from debs and .uci when you build from sources?
  Although deb2dsl makes the process simple, I don't think you have to have a deb package to create a dsl package.  Could be wrong.
  And everything else, I don't know! 
  -------------- Heavens to Murgatroid!
 |