mikshaw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ce47/3ce47e985ab15a24d340f7ee67fb1117182cdde6" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Mar. 20 2006,21:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
1) While I've never used the install scripts to understand what they are doing, this sounds like a good idea. Personally I don't have Windows, and when i did i never had trouble with bootloaders installed into mbr (on the contrary..i had trouble when it was *not* installed into the mbr), but more options usually means better results as far as I can see.
2) I thought there was one? Maybe i'm thinking of something else...streamripper, maybe?
3) mc was removed in a recent RC, and immediately put back in after several users protested. In a way, having two file managers is redundant, but when you consider that emelfm can be used only in a graphical environment you might see that mc is actually more useful than emelfm. In any case, I agree that adding it with myDSL might be a better idea, but then I feel that way about most applications...including emelfm, beaver, firefox, dillo, and just about every other gui app =o)
-------------- http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
|