TyphoonMentat
Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
|
Posted: Mar. 16 2004,18:07 |
|
When compiling Links 2 a few days ago, I discovered that the executable size is several hundred Kb smaller than the links-hacked executable, even when links-hacked was compressed with UPX. Links 2 seems to offer the same features - SSL, Javascript, frames and so on, and the rendering engine seems at least on a par with that of links-hacked. Out of interest, is there a reason why links-hacked was chosen over Links 2?
|