roberts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7859d/7859df6fcda0ce042563c8ede99e2bc6758bbe0d" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4983
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: June 19 2007,15:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
There seems to be far more interest in DSL than DSL-N. This may be because of the many distributions in that size/kernel range.
So, given the limited resorces, me, I focus where the interest is. It is also true, that I develope for DSL because I only own old hardware.
I think John has DSL-N available for those who can make use of it. I have discussed other possible avenues for the creation of a 2.6 Etch based DSL-N. I have asked John to review what I have suggested. But at the moment, I do not know of a timeline. I cannot speak for John.
I am sure that you are aware, I am working on a major upgrade to DSL. Not only to upgrade the kernel, but trying to improve ease of use.
|