Juanito
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67a69/67a694f8c90ee06b8c8de4a7ba131f44f789f1c4" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: April 21 2008,07:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Having being caught out again by compiling with gnu-utils loaded (thanks for the feedback Jason), I'm wondering if it makes sense to have a gnu-utils.uci that can be unloaded.
A couple of questions:
1. Was gnu-utils originally intended to be only coreutils from here http://directory.fsf.org/project/coreutils/ ? 2. Given that there are probably more extensions containing xlibs, gtk2, etc than when gnu-utils was created, does it make sense to have only coreutils in gnu-utils? 3. Without having looked yet, I presume gnu-utils.dsl overwrites some apps in the base dsl - in the uci, I guess it would be OK to add a load script that moves these apps to /tmp and an unload script that moves them back?
The reasoning behind all this is that I need gnu-utils loaded at boot to load alsa at boot and (I guess) I also use some of the fully fledged (versus busybox) utilities without realising it, but I also need a way to unload gnu-utils to check that extensions do not depend on it.
|