cbagger01
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Nov. 12 2003,19:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I have yet to use Opera on DSL (I haven't done a hard disk install yet), but I have used Opera on the following system:
60Mhz Pentium 40MB RAM Peanut Linux OS, stripped down to save memory and CPU
My experience was as follows: Dillo, graphical Links and Mozilla (original Mozilla, NOT the Mozilla Firebird) ran unacceptably slow on my system.
Opera, even though it is a full-featured browser that is slow to load up, runs suprisingly well once it is up and running.
I have not compared it head-to-head with Firebird yet, but it beats the pants off of Dillo, Links and Mozilla when used on an old computer system.
|