| here come the using-it questions #1Forum: User Feedback Topic: here come the using-it questions #1 started by: dslrgm  Posted by dslrgm on Sep. 05 2007,16:14 I have installed Frugal on hda1, swap is hda2 and home is hda3 Since I have a cheatcode of home=hda3, do I remove from .filetool.lst the line: home/dsl/ Afterall, why am I backing up what is on hda3 to a .gz file on hda3 (where I have set up the backup location)? BTW, this is not covered in the wiki Persistent home directory topic. Next quesiton: Where do I learn about Busybox commands? I am use to Redhat/Centos. I mean I type in: man wlan and the terminal session hangs. Let alone the equiv to 'locate' (I see that there is updatedb).  Posted by curaga on Sep. 05 2007,16:27 DSL has network man pages, and if you don't use a current one, the man page server recently went offline, so no wonder you can't see the manuals.. for busybox commands, "busybox" lists them, and "command --help" tells what it can do.. Locate isn't included, but I think it's in gnu-utils. Without it you can always do a (slow) recursive search, like the sloow windoze one.. 
 For that backup thingy I can't say anything. It does sound reasonable though not to back it up.,.  Posted by dslrgm on Sep. 05 2007,18:28  
 Kind of hard to do a network man pages when what you are trying to find out about is the network commands and config files..... I SUPPOSE, I can put my ethernet card back in and use that to get to man pages. I have the disk space. Is there a MyDSL app for help that I can download?    Posted by curaga on Sep. 05 2007,18:40 yes.. but it doesn't have all the man pages, or the right versions of all..  Posted by dslrgm on Sep. 05 2007,19:40  
 ARGH!!!!  Posted by mikshaw on Sep. 05 2007,20:12  
 
  Posted by dslrgm on Sep. 05 2007,21:45  
 But first you have to know what the busybox command is in place of the Redhat command....  Posted by roberts on Sep. 05 2007,21:53 Perhaps you should try typing busybox at a command prompt.  Posted by dslrgm on Sep. 06 2007,01:12  
 Oh.... Now how was I suppose to know that??? < http://www.busybox.net/about.html > "BusyBox combines tiny versions of many common UNIX utilities into a single small executable. It provides replacements for most of the utilities you usually find in GNU fileutils, shellutils, etc. The utilities in BusyBox generally have fewer options than their full-featured GNU cousins; however, the options that are included provide the expected functionality and behave very much like their GNU counterparts. BusyBox provides a fairly complete environment for any small or embedded system." Wonders of Google. But then,I should have known....   |