| DSL 4 & SambaForum: Networking Topic: DSL 4 & Samba started by: danielp  Posted by danielp on Nov. 04 2007,14:00 I did a frugal install of DSL 4.0 yesterday, and installed the samba.dsl mydsl extension. Some comments: 1)from an end user perspective (newbie here), I'd say that the new smb.conf file is less user friendly than the one included with DSL 3.4. Is there a reason for the change? 2)testparm doesn't work anymore; was it removed from DSL? And now I also have another problems: a)my /dev/hda3 automatically mounts somewhere, while previously with 3.4 I had to mount it manually in /opt/bootlocal.sh What's the reason for that change? b)the samba share is readable from my other network PC, but not writeable; while it worked with DSL 3.4 previously. I'm fairly sure it's not a smb.conf problem, but a rights problem. Could it come from problem a) above? Who should be the owner of the shared folder? Thanks for your help!  Posted by Juanito on Nov. 04 2007,14:40  
 - it will be in /usr/bin if it is still there (I'm writing this from a dsl-3.4.x machine). 
 - smb.conf should have something like this: 
 - my share is dsl.staff but I'm not sure a windows machine would know this?  Posted by danielp on Nov. 04 2007,15:01 Thanks Juanito. I'm not in front of my DSL box right now, but I'm quite sure I don't have the guest ok = yes line, so I will add that. I was trying to write from another linux PC, but in the end it will be also be used from a windows PC.  Posted by danielp on Nov. 04 2007,19:29 OK: testparm is still there; wonder why I didn't see it before;  thanks! But the write access problem still persisted. I also had owner dsl.staff for my share. Seeing that my other share /tmp still worked in write mode, I looked at the owner of that one, and guess what, it was root.root. So I changed my other share to root.root and now I can write on it! I have a feeling there's a problem related to the fact that the /mnt/hda3 is automatically mounted at startup by the new version of DSL, while I had to manually do it from /opt/bootlocal.sh Maybe Robert can confirm? |