daldred
Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: Mar. 2006 |
|
Posted: Jan. 04 2007,21:09 |
|
I have an old Libretto 50CT - 75MHz processor, 32Mb memory, HDD upgraded to 6Gb of which I keep a Win98 installation on 2Gb. The rest of the drive is available for Linux.
At present I have a DSL installation dating back to March 06, when I did a HD install (using loadlin from DOS to get the installation started - the Libretto has no CD drive).
I've also installed the XAMPP apache/mysql/php system on the machine for use when developing websites. It takes ages to start XAMPP on this small a machine, but once it's going it's quite fast enough.
With 3.2 appearing over the horizon, it's time to upgrade: but I'm not certain what form of installation to use. There seems to be a lot of positive comment about Frugal compared with HD, but I'm far from clear whether this would work in a low-memory environment. MyDSL extensions are said to need more memory, but the later versions can apparently be put on HD to save RAM.
What I want is DSL, with (in some way) a webserver which can deal with PHP files and some form of database (doesn't have to be MySQL - SQLite can be persuaded to emulate it closely enough for my purposes if necessary).
Since I generally boot to Linux rather than Windows, I want it to start from LILO / Grub or whatever on startup, not go through a Windows boot first!
Do I need to do what I did before (install to HD, ignore MyDSL ideas, install XAMPP), or is there a better (or at least 'purer DSL') way to do it?
|