KerowynM
Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: June 2006 |
 |
Posted: June 14 2006,23:21 |
 |
I often wondered why so much space is used for firefox when we have dillo. Yeah, I guess I'd load the extension every time but thats a lot of room for the CLI apps I personally think should be in the mix instead (No screen? parted? wow those are gimmies heh, at least they have extensions.) But I do hate redundancy. I realize that firefox is the better choice in most cases, but in the cases where I'd use dillo most of the time I'm just going to load a text-only/CLI browser anyway. So yes either one could go and I wouldn't blink.
I suppose I could remaster my own but really why bother when extensions are so easily loaded? Over all I don't think there is a much better combination of apps for a generalized user base. There are things on it I'll never use in a million years but other people it will be all they are using it for. I still scratch my head and wonder why no screen tho... boggles the mind. 
|
.
DSL Market ,
Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
