Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
 

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Unionfs and Ext3, Whats the Difference?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
sankarv Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: Aug. 03 2006,10:20 QUOTE

DSL 3.0(+) has unionfs. Previous versions had ext3.

How does they differ. Whats actually the advantage(s) of Unionfs?


--------------
Think before you do anything...
Back to top
Profile PM 
Zucca Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: Feb. 2006
Posted: Aug. 03 2006,11:22 QUOTE

Please use Google more often.

However here's some information from Wikipedia:
Quote
UnionFS is a Linux filesystem service which emulates a union mount for Linux file systems. It allows files and directories of separate file systems, known as branches, to be transparently overlaid, forming a single coherent file system. Contents of directories which have the same path within the merged branches will be seen together in a single merged directory, within the new, virtual filesystem.

The different branches may be read-only or read-write file systems, so that writes to the virtual, merged copy can be directed to a specific real filesystem. This leads to one other useful purpose for union mounts, which is to make a filesystem appear as writeable, but without actually allowing writes to change the filesystem, also known as copy-on-write. This may be desirable when the media is physically read-only, such as in the case of CDROMs, or for using a single common template for a number of filesystems, or perhaps for security reasons. The Linux implementation, UnionFS, is sometimes used as an ad-hoc snapshotting system.

When mounting branches the priority of one branch over the other is specified. So when both branches contain a file with the same name one gets priority over the other.

UnionFS in Linux is generally not recommended for production use.

On LiveCDs it is used as a way of overlaying a writeable file system on top of read-only media. In KNOPPIX for example the union of the file system on the CD-ROM or DVD may be made with the file system contained in an image file called knoppix.img on a USB memory stick which has priority over the read-only filesystem. The user sees then a logical file system where it is possible to add and change files anywhere. What happens on the physical level is that if a file which resides in the read-only branch is replaced by a new version it is put into the image file. As the union file system merges the two branches transparently the user just sees the new version.


--------------
Do you have it? - http://dy.fi/mak
Back to top
Profile PM WEB ICQ MSN 
sankarv Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: Aug. 03 2006,12:06 QUOTE

thankx a lot

--------------
Think before you do anything...
Back to top
Profile PM 
2 replies since Aug. 03 2006,10:20 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: Unionfs and Ext3

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code