iB::Topic::bigger than dsl?

	Damn Small Linux :: Damn Small Linux Board The DSL Forums

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » User Feedback » bigger than dsl?

		Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
		Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic

Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Topic: bigger than dsl?, smallest with kde?

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

toasterman Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Sep. 2006

Posted: Sep. 18 2006,11:41

Hi everyone,
I see DSL doesn't include KDE for performance/size issues.

I've been looking at building a mini-itx pc, and possibly using solid state memory instead of a conventional hard disk to keep it even smaller and lower power.
Downside of this is undoubtedly the additional cost of the drives.

I'm looking at using a 256/512mb ide flash drive. Although I'm a total newbie to Linux, Windows isn't an option for many reasons - filesize, cost (am planning it legit), speed on slower processors/lower ram amounts...etc

So does anyone know whats the smallest Linux you can get away with, that includes everything DSL has, plus KDE?

Thanks in advance for help

-Ben-

dtf

Group: Members
Posts: 196
Joined: Nov. 2005

Posted: Sep. 19 2006,01:48

DSL and KDE are not a good mix. DSL was not really designed to run with KDE because the resources require to run KDE. If you are looking for a more standard graphical desktop then you might look into puppy linux or xunbuntu. Not my choices and I am not sure of the disk and memory requirements. However, if you want to keep things small and with good performance and are willing to do some configuration yourself, DSL is a very good alternative.

mikshaw

Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004

Posted: Sep. 19 2006,03:12

Just guessing, but I'd say it would be much less work to become familiar with fluxbox and simplicity than to try incorporating KDE into DSL while retaining a reasonable size. A typical KDE base installation is several times the size of the entire DSL system.

--------------
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html

dslfool

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: April 2004

Posted: Sep. 19 2006,21:34

DSL is far and away my favorite distro under 100MB (and one of my favorites of any size). In the sub-256MB class, when I'm in the mood for KDE I use SLAX (www.slax.org). The standard version is just under 200MB, but it achieves that size by using a lot of KDE-specific apps such as Konquerer as its web browser and KWrite as the word processor - no Firefox or OpenOffice, although these and other apps can be added by way of modules.

There may be smaller distros that include KDE, but when I've used SLAX I've been pleased with how well everything's worked.

(I'll mention too that there's a sub-128MB variant of SLAX that uses XFCE instead of KDE and includes fewer apps.)

--------------
Toshiba Portege 7200CTe notebook, 600MHz PIII, 8GB CF as HD, 320MB RAM
DSL 4.2.5 (frugal toram)
...and the picture is of Fuad Ramses from the film "Blood Feast".

Thulemanden Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: Sep. 2005

Posted: Sep. 23 2006,20:08

Toasterman; I would suggest you acquire a used labtop as it is built for minimum power and is as small as any mini-itx cabinet.

I use a web server running 233mHz and you should be able to spend no more than euro200.-

--------------
Linuxcounter member #322220. http_//www.linuxcounter.org

6 replies since Sep. 18 2006,11:41

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » User Feedback » bigger than dsl?