solarcontrol
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb. 2005 |
|
Posted: Feb. 08 2005,20:21 |
|
I didnt put DSL to the hd because I was just seeing if it would even recognize the cdrom (something some trim distros like Feather and Puppy wont do) since it has to boot from a floppy.
What I meant by DSL being "slow" was that most apps and GUIs tend to be slow on that dinosaur - namely pretty stuff - hence my dropping winslow95/98 for Deli in the 1st place.
Deli is a little more involved to install, and you have to add ALSA to get sound (at least I had to on mine - but of course Im a noob and also got it for learning linux, so maybe I missed something..), but it is made specifically for old machines from 486s to 166mhz - with older stuff like the 2.2.26 kernel, xfree 3.3.6, XD640, etc. MiniSlack boots ok on it, but like DSL, it's newer and more capable than that old thing needs (or wants) - besides, Deli is Slack 7.1 based anyway.
Anyhow, that old box has never run so fast and Deli is my choice so far for anything below 200mhz.
Dont get me wrong, I certainly didnt mean to disparage DSL in any way. It's awesome in my eyes just because such an advanced OS could even boot on that box, and it will be in my right holster from now on for anything above 200mhz.
(I refurb and maximize home comps for ppl that cant/wont buy new ones and today's linux has me quite stoked to say the least.)
|