Lodovik
  
 
 
  
 
 
Group: Members 
Posts: 17 
Joined: Jan. 2005 | 
  | 
Posted: April 16 2005,16:59 | 
   | 
 
 
  
Is there a difference between iso and syslinux other than in the booting process? I tried both and, on my computer (P4 2.4, Asus P4P800) only the syslinux boots properly. Do I miss some functionnality (drivers, support for some devices, etc...) with the syslinux? Should I use the iso? I boot my DSl CD on a lot of different computers so I guessed that the syslinux was more compatible with older hardware, as you said. Does it means that newer hardware is less well supported? 
 |