iB::Topic::DSL 1.3.1

	Damn Small Linux :: Damn Small Linux Board The DSL Forums

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » User Feedback » DSL 1.3.1

		Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
		Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic

Pages: (2) </ 1 2 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Topic: DSL 1.3.1, v1.3.1 dated 19th July 2005

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

mangatono

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: June 2005

Posted: July 29 2005,16:33

can someone tell me what is a diference betwen 1.3.1.iso ani 1.3.1syslinux.iso

clydew

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: July 2005

Posted: July 29 2005,20:50

I downloaded 1.3.1 from two different sites and got the same md5sum
which follows:

42ada28253ca7f1fd05345f04c4be5d0 dsl-1.3.1.iso

This is not official, but I hope it helps!

RoGuE_StreaK Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: Jan. 2004

Posted: July 30 2005,01:08

I think the syslinux iso's are supposed to have better boot support for older (read 486/P1 etc?) machines. Don't know if you lose out on some features if you boot syslinux on a newer machine. From my very limited experience of trying both syslinux and the standard iso, I couldn't see any real difference, but I wasn't being ultra-observant.

--------------
"I find your lack of penguin disturbing"
- Darth Tux

cbagger01

Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003

Posted: July 30 2005,04:25

I'm not 100% certain, but I believe that the Syslinux boot image contains less driver modules than the ISOlinux boot image.

This is because the ISOlinux bootload does not have the disk space limitation that exists for the syslinux one.

This shouldn't be a problem for older computers because they don't need all of these fancy new drivers.

But this whole assumption of mine could be false.

roberts

Group: Members
Posts: 4983
Joined: Oct. 2003

Posted: July 30 2005,06:10

Assumptions are correct.
Syslinux has the "embedded" floppy image that is limited to the 1.44MB. It, the boot.img is the same floppy image as bootfloopy.img and is found in the KNOPPIX directory. This size is very limiting for adding more modules. The isolinux version does not have this structure and therefore not as limited. The isolinux version uses the directory boot/isolinux/. Older computers most likely won't need the additional modules that are present in the isolinux version. Same goes for the bootfloopy.img. it is the same floppy image in the syslinux version. Again, those computer without bootable cdroms are the older computers and hence booting from a floppy drive is the same as booting from syslinux. Now, for newer computers, the isolinux version does offers more. If you have a newer computer try isolinux first.

8 replies since July 21 2005,10:26

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ 1 2 >/

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » User Feedback » DSL 1.3.1