Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Replacing Xvesa with Xfree, Would it be worth it?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Feb. 10 2007,10:47 QUOTE
I recently put DSL to a p1 desktop (124mhz, 16mb ram, 1g hd) and it's graphic card is a S3 trio 64 8mb pci.

If I got Knoppix 3.4 from somewhere, and compiled Xfree 3.3.6 with only the S3 driver, would it be worth it?

Xvesa takes about 6mb of ram.. But Xfree has acceleration.. So, would the speed gain from the accelerated modes be useless through more ram usage?

--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
mikshaw Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004
Posted: Feb. 10 2007,17:24 QUOTE
Have you tried the XFree86 mydsl extensions? The unc version would be good if you have limited ram.
I'd say if the extension works with your card it's definitely worth it. Not only would you get better performance, but you have the added ability to tweak your x settings more than what is available through Xvesa. A common example, you can change the refresh rate.

--------------
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Feb. 11 2007,09:58 QUOTE
I was going to compile my own version with only 1 driver to decrease Xfrees ram usage. Will the unc extension use more ram than Xvesa?

Oh and do I need to add a unionfs boot code to use the unc extension?

--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
Juanito Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005
Posted: Feb. 11 2007,11:37 QUOTE
unionfs is the default with DSL 3.2 (you have the use the boot code "legacy" if you do not want to use unionfs) so you can use XFree86.unc without doing anything special.

You could download XFree86.dsl, remove the uneeded drivers and then use dsl2unc.sh to make your own XFree86.unc but I am not sure you would gain anything in terms of memory usage.

Note that setting up the XF86Config-4 file can be a pain - there are lots of examples available via Google though.
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Feb. 15 2007,11:53 QUOTE
I think I'll try it. Is x86config tool included in the unc?

And the bigger problem: how to get the ext to the comp? :p
It has no usb, no means of networking (well a 56k winmodem with no linux solution), cd drive does read cd-r but I wouldn't waste one for 11 mb..
I could put a 5e lan card to it, but then what? I don't know how to use telnet or ssh.. Should I start some server on DSL and then connect with a crossover cable from my LinuxFromScratch laptop? And the lfs laptop isn't ready, meaning no X or browser, that would mean NFS since that is supported by the kernel. So how do I start a NFS server on DSL, and how do I connect to it from the laptop?
Back to top
Profile PM 
5 replies since Feb. 10 2007,10:47 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/ 		reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: Replacing Xvesa with Xfree

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code