Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (4) </ 1 2 [3] 4 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Status Report Intel D201GLY and DSL 4.1 (video)< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
Juanito Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005
Posted: Dec. 11 2007,06:12 QUOTE

mesa-6.5.2 was used to build xorg72 and gl.h was generated while building mesa.

I did not include the mesa headers in xorg72-dev because I didn't think about it at the time. Thinking about it now, the xorg72 compilation uses the mesa sources for its own purposes but does not depend on mesa directly so I'm not sure whether the mesa headers belong with xorg72-dev or not.

You could get the headers by compiling mesa-6.5.2 or, if you drop me a pm, I could send you the tarball.

If somebody who understands these things better than me could given an opinion on the subject, I could add the mesa headers (libs as well?) to xorg72-dev.
Back to top
Profile PM 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: Dec. 11 2007,06:18 QUOTE

Quote
$ sudo cp -r /tmp/xorg72 /opt
$ sudo rm -r /tmp/xorg72 [optional]
Could use mv instead?

You could add them, or even create another extension (that suggests the xorg72-dev package).  I call it entirely up to you, since the xorg72 package itself isn't split up.
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Dec. 11 2007,07:49 QUOTE

Well, they are essential in building apps that use opengl..

Having a separate extension would allow compiling those with only base DSL.


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
mhatch Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: Dec. 2007
Posted: Dec. 12 2007,13:00 QUOTE

Thank you for the Mesa tar ball, that got me passed that one.

I am now missing the drm headers. (xf86drm.h and friends). Is it normal for an x.org distro to reference XFree headers?

Mark
Back to top
Profile PM 
Juanito Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005
Posted: Dec. 12 2007,13:12 QUOTE

...and yes, libdrm-2.3.0 was used to build xorg72 and contains drm.h xf86drm.h etc - I guess I should have thought to include these with the mesa headers since mesa reuired drm to build.

I'm travelling at the moment, so I cannot double-check exactly what is compiled by libdrm for a couple of days.
Back to top
Profile PM 
17 replies since Dec. 10 2007,18:44 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (4) </ 1 2 [3] 4 >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: Status Report Intel D201GLY and DSL 4.1 (video)

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code