| cmanb  
 
 
 
 
 Group: Members
 Posts: 95
 Joined: Dec. 2005
 | 
|  | Posted: May 04 2006,18:27 |  |  
 | Quote (pr0f3550r @ May 04 2006,10:00) |  | So: 
 - .dsl is when you build from debs and .uci when you build from sources?
 
 - can you build .uci from .debs?
 
 - If so, why not obsolete .dsl's and promote only .uci's?
 
 - If so, why the .uci extensions intead of .tar.gz?
 
 - Don't you think .uci resemble, in some misterious ways, the Slackware package?
 | 
 Other people know a lot more about this than I do, so correct me if I'm wrong, but ...
 
 - If so, why not obsolete .dsl's and promote only .uci's?
 
 UCIs are very carefully contained under /opt by being mounted as a device.  They are usually not "installed" at all.  They are mostly Read-Only.
 
 DSLs install, I believe, system wide.  Or at least wider than a UCI will.  They are also "installed", in the traditional sense that files are written to the system.  (Is it in loading a DSL that mkwritable is run?)
 
 - If so, why the .uci extensions intead of .tar.gz?
 
 For the same reasons listed above:  UCIs are easly loaded (mounted), contained under /opt, can be unmounted, and are Read-Only.  tar.gzs are none of these things.
 
 - .dsl is when you build from debs and .uci when you build from sources?
 
 Although deb2dsl makes the process simple, I don't think you have to have a deb package to create a dsl package.  Could be wrong.
 
 And everything else, I don't know!
 
 --------------
 Heavens to Murgatroid!
 |