mikshaw
Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004 |
|
Posted: Sep. 24 2006,14:51 |
|
If you want it to be compatible (readable/writeable) with both Windows and DSL, the only choice is fat.
My personal belief is that including filesystem drivers just so you can access files in Windows is adding unnecessary complexity to your situation. Since a portable DSL runs from RAM and a mounted cloop, the filesystem on which the KNOPPIX file resides is not terribly important. The filesystem *does* become important when 1) you want to boot something other than fat or ext, or 2) you want to store uncompressed files while keeping file ownerships and permissions.
-------------- http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
|