lucky13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 25 2008,22:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote | I also would prefer to use Clamav over a non open source app |
As good as some open source software is, I have a significantly different and higher criterion for things that relate to security: How well does it actually work?
Quote | The average product detected 86.95 percent, the median 90.97 percent....
ClamAV 387,276 63.81%
|
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2135092,00.asp
Needless to say, ClamAV isn't my first choice in Windows AV software. But ClamWin is nice and portable. FWIW, closed source BitDefender's detection rate was 95.68%. But like I said, I have different criteria for how I keep Windows computers safe. Maybe that's why I don't have the kind of trouble your friends and family do.
-------------- "It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end." -- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
|