clacker
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81683/8168394a1e66a1f02b3517c232ca249d67645c7b" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 570
Joined: June 2004 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 30 2005,23:07 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I know we all want to keep below the 50Meg limit, and I was wondering what people have tried to make that happen. I had two thoughts.
The first was to try freedups, which reduced the 0.9.2 iso by 97K. Not a lot, but hey, every little bit counts.
My second thought was to re-order the files that get fed into create_compressed_fs. That way, there would be a better chance that a 64K block would be all text or all uncompressable. I'm not sure how to change the order that files are saved into the iso. I've read that iso's have a standard (files in alphabetical order), but do compressed file systems need that restriction?
|