reidar
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: Sep. 2004 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Sep. 13 2004,11:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I have used .dsl files for my hd-install, and they work just fine. I am not really sure if there are any disadvantages. If you use apt-get you might get the more updated programs of course. (OO.dsl is OO version 1.1.0 I think?)
I have a hd-install of dsl, and I don't have network connection on that computer, so I have therefore downloaded and used .dsls (as I explained), and I have also downloaded a set of sarge cds. I then do apt-cdrom add, and apt-get install all the progs I want. Works fine!
-r
|