Joined: Jan. 2004
||Posted: Feb. 12 2005,05:07
So why does everyone always reckon ME was worse than 98SE, 98, or 95? On my 233 laptop and 450 desktop, both of which obviously couldn't handle XP, ME was by far better and more stable than the previous incarnations. Maybe it depends on the harware, release build, etc. But I always had much better luck with ME than 95, 98, or 98SE (never used NT4 or 2000). Or maybe it's 'cause I always completely tweak any install of windows to cut down on the crap and set it up how I like it (well, near enough) before I even contemplate starting to use it...
Like XP Pro, I spend about half a day tweaking an install, then ghosting it, before I actually DO anything with it. Quite a lot of bloat you can get rid of.
Don't know why macs never brought in a right mouse button!? I need to get more experience on macs (especially as they're by far more popular than pcs in the print / advertising industry)
"I find your lack of penguin disturbing"
- Darth Tux