roberts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7859d/7859df6fcda0ce042563c8ede99e2bc6758bbe0d" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4983
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Dec. 06 2004,16:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote | My guess is that roberts has installed DSL-embedded on a USB drive (FAT file system) while everyone else is trying to install it to a native EXT2 partition on a hard drive or in the RAMdisk. |
No. Actually, downloaded into /home/dsl the ramdisk. unzip in ramdisk. It is OK. Second test. download to ext2, unzip into ext2. It is OK.
However, I am using DSL and the unzip program that is in DSL.
Could it be the version of unzip that others are using?
Normally I would not use zip. But lets be real this is primarily for Windows users and that is why I am using zip.
If manually setting the perms is the answer then OK. But I still like to get to the bottom of these kinds of things. Can anyone else verify that running DSL using DSL's unzip works. I know I am exhausted from all the work that when into this release. But honsetly, this morning, I again verified that it works.
|