Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (2) </ 1 [2] >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Partition/drive icons on desktop., Icons for easy mounting/changing r/w< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
ShawnMilo Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: Aug. 2005
Posted: Aug. 31 2005,03:20 QUOTE

JP,

Thanks for the explanation. That's good to know. I wish there was a different answer, mainly so I could recommend a DSL CD to people as readily as a Knoppix CD. But I still love DSL and will continue to use it.

Milo

p.s.
May the light illumine you.
Back to top
Profile PM 
mikshaw Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004
Posted: Aug. 31 2005,03:52 QUOTE

I guess it would depend on what people consider important in an operating system.  Personally I don't see icons as being important at all, or very useful, and i definitely don't base my recommendations on whether or not icons are created dynamically according to your hardware =O)
For a liveCD, I'd find it hard to recommend something that requires as much ram as many distros do (for example, the Suse liveDVD recommends a minimum of 384mb...bleh).

For creating mount icons, Xtdesk has a separation of "program" and "mount" icons.  I'm not exactly sure what the difference is, but here is an example that you can compare to the "program" icons that are included with DSL:
Code Sample
table Icon
Type: Mount
Caption: /dev/cdrom
Command: mount
IconMount: /home/dsl/.xtdesktop/cdrom_mount.gif
IconUmount: /home/dsl/.xtdesktop/cdrom_umount.gif
X:
Y:
MenuCommand1: Mount CDROM : mount /dev/cdrom
MenuCommand2: Umount CDROM : umount /dev/cdrom
MenuCommand3: Eject CDROM : eject /dev/cdrom

end


--------------
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
SaidinUnleashed Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mar. 2004
Posted: Aug. 31 2005,05:25 QUOTE

Heck I don't even use icons. Not even in Windows. I use BBlean instead of exploder, and an alrernate filemanager.

In Ubuntu, I use XFCE or enlightenment.

Icons are ugly, and get in the way of my wallpaper anyway.


--------------
They say if you play a Microsoft CD backwards, you hear satanic messages. That's nothing, cause if you play it forwards, it installs Windows.

Unleash the power of the TILDE~~~
Back to top
Profile PM AOL MSN YIM 
adssse Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 505
Joined: Mar. 2005
Posted: Aug. 31 2005,12:49 QUOTE

I know people that swear by using icons, but I myself dont like to use them either. One of the first things I do when I do a new install is goto 'no icons'. I much prefer to use the menu's because it looks much cleaner without icons and I believe it saves me some ram on my old system too.
Back to top
Profile PM 
cbagger01 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003
Posted: Aug. 31 2005,17:35 QUOTE

noicons does save RAM.

xtdesk typically uses about 1MB of RAM for me.

Each dockapp also uses a similar amount of RAM.
Back to top
Profile PM 
9 replies since Aug. 30 2005,19:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ 1 [2] >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: Partition/drive icons on desktop.

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code