Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (15) </ ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: easier way to compile stuff for DSL, chroot + debootstrap< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Oct. 18 2007,14:54 QUOTE

They are hard links to each other. So delete both or just overwrite.

Your tactic was fine, why didn't you mention that before?

--host=i686..blah would make a gcc that only runs on 686. When using --host=i486--blah it will still know you are compiling on a 686 but compile for a 486..


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Oct. 18 2007,14:55 QUOTE

Oh, and I believe people might just compile on a 486 :)
I compiled some on my i586 too..


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
Juanito Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005
Posted: Oct. 19 2007,15:56 QUOTE

Hmm - it's not so obvious that the hardlinks can be deleted:
Code Sample
$ ../glibc-2.3.2/configure --prefix=/opt/build --enable-shared --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.4.26 --disable-static --host=i486-pc-linux-gnu --target=i486-pc-linux-gnu --with-arch=i486

checking for i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... no
checking for i486-pc-linux-gnu-cc... no
checking for gnumake... no
checking for gmake... no
checking for make... make
checking version of make... 3.80, ok
configure: error:
*** These critical programs are missing or too old: gcc

Unless I make a symlink gcc -> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc? (rather than leaving both gcc and  i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc)
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Oct. 19 2007,15:58 QUOTE

No need to delete them, though :)

Hard links take less space than symlinks..


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
Juanito Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005
Posted: Oct. 19 2007,17:02 QUOTE

Quote
Hard links take less space than symlinks..

-really? They show up as the same size (gcc = i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc)  in emelFM...
Back to top
Profile PM 
73 replies since June 18 2007,19:08 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (15) </ ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: easier way to compile stuff for DSL

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code