roberts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7859d/7859df6fcda0ce042563c8ede99e2bc6758bbe0d" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4983
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 04 2006,06:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
First I meant to say, I would not run the remastering process on a flash device. Flash devices have limited number of writes.
In my opinion, it is best to remaster on another machine and when you have your system ready, then I would do a Lilo Frugal install.
If you boot dsl with the install boot option:
boot: install
You will see the menu I use to do installs. I prefer frugal grub for hard drive installs, or where you would want easy access to the grub boot menu to change boot options.
But typically with a flash device, CF, I would not want any user to have such easy access to change boot options. Lilo works good for this situation.
Either way, a frugal install will drastically cut down on real system writes thus prolonging the life of your flash device. Use frugal over the traditional hard drive install.
|