iB::Topic::June Extensions

	Damn Small Linux :: Damn Small Linux Board The DSL Forums

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Damn Small Linux Board » MyDSL Extensions » The Testing Area » June Extensions

		Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
		Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic

Pages: (9) </ ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Topic: June Extensions

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

mikshaw

Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004

Posted: July 01 2007,14:49

There should be no conflict unless the user (for unknown reason?) decides to add both lib directories to the library path from a startup or login script. Unless that happens, the lib provided with Audacity affects only the audacity package and any child processes of Audacity.

stupid_idiot: If you still have the time/desire, would you consider keeping the includes with the package, or submitting them as a separate dev package? When this library is available in the repository, I will see about making it a dependency for the next Audacity package, which would be *much* smaller as a result and would make any potential conflict a moot issue.

--------------
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html

stupid_idiot Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: Oct. 2006

Posted: July 01 2007,17:00

Making a symlink from /usr/local/include/wx-2.6 to /opt/libwxgtk1-dev/wx-2.6 will do, besides including '/usr/local/bin/{wx-config,wxrc,wxrc-2.6}'. 'libwxgtk1-dev.uci' will be a little over 700k. Meanwhile, 'libwxgtk1.uci' is ~1800k. This seems like the best way. Also, it is very good to hear audacity can be reduced in size.

41 replies since June 12 2007,01:17

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (9) </ ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] >/

Damn Small Linux Board » MyDSL Extensions » The Testing Area » June Extensions