Jason W
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66aea/66aea5d3861e55cacba71334f1ddbaf4fc6b41d9" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 260
Joined: Nov. 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43a0a/43a0a55ba26863a76443227efae7a49364908649" alt="" |
Posted: April 06 2008,04:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff9e/eff9e84cc248ee53d6cf7ca320bb3a3e9c54c1a3" alt="QUOTE" |
Juanito, Your sane.uci detects my umax scanner fine using sane-find-scanner, but that is as far as I can go, being spoiled by xsane no doubt. I am not too familiar with scanning at the command line, and my xsane.dsl does not work with this extension. Since it finds my scanner, I am sure it is just a pebkac/configuration issue on my part. Are either you or WDef working on an xsane.uci? If not I would be happy to build one that would work with a sane.uci package.
|