^thehatsrule^
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 14 2008,06:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Just a small typo... missing the s.
Quote (mikshaw @ Jan. 13 2008,21:31) | Quote (mikshaw @ Jan. 12 2008,22:34) Is the kernel used for 4.x the same as the one used for 2.x? Specifically, does the nvidia driver that works for DSL 2.x now work for the current DSL?
^thehatsrule^: Yes. It should, as afaik the kernel was rolled back for things like that.
Sorry, but it don't. I get a message: Can't load nvidia This is using nvidia2.dsl, which was built for DSL 2 (kernel 2.4.31) Apparently that 2.4.31 is not the same 2.4.31 that is in the current DSL |
Should this not be discussed in the extensions section? Anyways, when do you get that error? I've loaded up the extension on a machine that doesn't have any testable hardware, but modprobe did try to insert it (and failed accordingly).
And I have found a somewhat related issue with these type of extensions...
|