Islander
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: Sep. 2004 |
|
Posted: Dec. 13 2006,22:40 |
|
The Hats, and Mikshaw, thanks for your suggestions.
I used "knoppix_name=dsl301" and "knoppix_name=dsl092" successfully. Well, almost. I can load dsl301 from hdb2, and from USB sda1. [Excellent, and thanks.] I can load dsl092 from USB sda1, but not from hdb2. [I had already generated separate boot[s] and initrd[s] for each of these, using separate folders and pointing Grub to them, in a similar fashion to mikshaw's.] The failure to load dsl092 from hdb2 shows up as a blue text repeat, of the loader at some stage trying to read sda2, 3, 4 ...15, then sdb1, 2, 3 etc, all the way to sdg, I think, then it announces kernel panic.
This is the same symptom that I had up until I started using, in the last few days, dsl 301. I wanted to get dsl092 running on hdb2, and had tried to use "knoppix_dir=something" as The Hats suggested, and in fact as I had used without difficulty for the other distros on the machine. I was familiar with that option, but it just didn't work for me with DSL.
Now that I've reached the same problem despite using 'knoppix_name', I'm wondering if the problem was that dsl092 always would load off CD and USB, but not off hdb2 - which is an ext2 drive on my system. I'm not very familiar with the linux loading sequence, but I remember reading somewhere that isolinux, and syslinux differ, and that one of the differences relates to loading from FAT or Ext2 partitions. I think that might be the reason why I've had difficulty getting dsl092 loading from my Ext2 partition.
DSL 301 seems very happy, and it works with the 'old' "optional" system for apps, (which is why I had wanted to stick with 092), so I think I'll run with 301 now. It is very good, and very fast to load, and pretty easy to use, so why not.
Again, Mikshaw and The Hats, thank you for your pointers - it's more or less working for me now, and I can adapt with more versions when I want to.
regards, Islander
|