jgombos
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: Nov. 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Nov. 14 2006,03:47 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I may have set a record for the most resource deprived machine to run DSL. I installed it on the 486dx2-66 with 8MB ram by moving the HDD to a better machine for the installation, however, it runs in a degraded state when I put it back in the older machine. X fails, so it drops to a command prompt.
I have tried DeLi linux, and the live CD failed to fully boot (like DSL), and I gave up on it. It may be worth a shot to try the same approach on DeLi that worked for DSL. Though I'm not sure what could be more lean than Xvesa for an Xserver.
I looked at the requirements for BasicLinux, and found it surprizing that the native linux installation requires 12 MB of ram, while the version that runs as a layer on top of DOS requires less memory (3MB).
FreeBSD could be promising. Version 2.2.9 runs on 8MB of RAM.
|