Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (4) </ 1 2 3 [4] >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: 2.4.34.2 kernel - would you have use for it?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: May 11 2007,16:12 QUOTE

I decided not to do it. It really wouldn't be necessary.

hats: the modules are incompatible with 2.4.26, so there would be no use for 2 parts-style..

Juanito: Here's a short lineup. Ask if you need more ;)

Downloaded 2.4.34.2 full source from kernel.org, then the patches for ntfs, supermount, and bootsplash, then got kernelsource.dsl, extracted only knoppix-patch and .config from there (needed those only)..
Juggled those around (applied patches except knoppix-patch, moved .config to my kernel dir etc..)

I did edit that knoppix patch around here (didn't like/need all the stuff it does....)
Then 'make menuconfig', disabling and enabling stuff, starting from DSL kernel config details.
After that, like told, applied knoppix patch. Then edited Makefile and .version (it looks cool, the internal kernel name is 2.4.34.2-Laxy #1337).

make modules bzImage
make modules_install
upx --brute arch/i386/boot/bzImage
That ^ took about 150k off the kernel, and sped booting (it only affects the kernel decompression stage) with 3s
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/laxy-upxed
edited menu.lst, rebooted. That's pretty much it. I didn't fiddle with initrd for frugal/livecd 'cause I decided not to do the extension, but I could've done that too. Initrd would need a little tweaking (mostly replacing modules there with compatible (current) ones), I'd also tweaked it for speed...

Oh. I also think it's currently a gzipped ext2 image, I'd make it either ramfs/romfs/cramfs..


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: May 12 2007,02:12 QUOTE

Well you still would need those 2 parts, since you need to boot the new kernel.

Also, for my version of 2.4.34, I used the dsl.config from the DSL2.1's 2.4.31 sources, instead of the .config from 2.4.26
Why?  Some new stuff, ie sata modules etc. are already configured for you I suppose.
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: May 12 2007,08:57 QUOTE

hats: I meant they should be in one package, 'cause separation would be no use, kernel without modules doesn't do much... (unless it's static of course)

--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
17 replies since April 19 2007,15:38 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (4) </ 1 2 3 [4] >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: 2.4.34.2 kernel - would you have use for it?

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code