Juanito
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67a69/67a694f8c90ee06b8c8de4a7ba131f44f789f1c4" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 1601
Joined: Sep. 2005 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Dec. 01 2007,08:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote | That is not good news. So it appears that fluxbox, even newer ones, and Xvesa, even with a newer version, the issue of a memory leak remains. |
- Perhaps first we could have a look at which versions of fluxbox and k-drive I could try out. At present I am using the version of fluxbox that comes with dsl-3.4.2 and the k-drive from xfree-4.6 Are there more up to date versions that I could try out that make sense in the context of dsl?
Quote | Too me, this is a show stopper. I am inclined to remove something that would cause a system failure and therefore possible data loss. |
- I take your point, but on the other hand I only noticed for this for the first time a few days ago after using dsl for 2.5 years and after 38d uptime. At the moment, the memory leak has stopped again (at 40,686k) - I wonder if firefox is somehow involved in this?
|