lucky13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Mar. 24 2008,16:30 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote | Lucky13, it's not because of that. It seems to be a bug in one of the bootscripts, not taking HD-install into account (as it can have extensions installed but deleted) |
All the more reason to stop supporting hard drive installs. I know DSL works fine like that, but I still think people who want "Debian-like" systems should use something designed for that whether it's Debian or something like DeLi which is less bloated. Between the xfs/jfs/hfs(+) issues I had with the hotplug script and this kind of thing, it only reinforces the point that DSL should be either nomadic or "normal" and not try to cover every base.
-------------- "It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end." -- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
|