Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (4) </ 1 2 [3] 4 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: fdisk/cfdisk probs w/large drives?, partitions on drive not recognized< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
AwPhuch Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1404
Joined: April 2004
Posted: Oct. 21 2004,16:01 QUOTE

Plus I think those other distros create a /boot parition in which it is smaller than the 1024Bytes...

DSL creates one large honkering / partition in which the other directories are located....

Perhaps if you created a 10-15Meg /boot parition on say /dev/hda1 and the larger / dir on /dev/hda2 it might recognize it and use the /boot partition and fix your problem

Brian
AwPhuch


--------------
http://www.frappr.com/dsl <-- Where do you use DSL?
http://www.smoothwall.org <-- Ultimate firewall for the world!
http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php/userID:6107 <--My BOINC stats!
./S99LinuxRevolution start
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
msuho Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: Oct. 2004
Posted: Oct. 22 2004,02:30 QUOTE

I don't think it's the tiny partition thing.

If I boot up DSL & look at my drive, I get:

fdisk root@box:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 2113 MB, 2113536000 bytes
64 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 = 2064384 bytes


For comparasion's sake, I loaded Suse 9.1, and ran the same command:

linux:/home/msuho # fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 20.4 GB, 20490559488 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39703 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1               1       39001    19656472+  83  Linux
/dev/hda2           39002       39703      353808   82  Linux swap


Look at the disk size & the number of cylinders- different. Same disk. Same BIOS. Notice, too, that Suse's booting out of one big partiotion.  I don't know if it's the kernel or the fdisk command.

I really appreciate all the advice & suggestions. I may just have to be content with using DSL from one of my other boxes.

Thanks,

Mark
Back to top
Profile PM 
cbagger01 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003
Posted: Oct. 22 2004,04:59 QUOTE

I wonder if the "gnu-utils.dsl" extension contains a different version of the cfdisk or fdisk utility?

Try installing this extension and then see what your drive configuration looks like.
Back to top
Profile PM 
skaos Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 430
Joined: April 2004
Posted: Oct. 22 2004,09:49 QUOTE

Two suggestions:
- make a 1 GB partition at the beginning of the disk and install DSL.
- look up the heads/cyls/sectors info for your disk and compare to the output from Suse and DSL fdisk. If they are the same as the Suse fdisk info, try to set/force them at the DSl boot:-prompt.

Suse vs. DSL: Could it be that the Suse kernel is placed within the first 8GB, and the DSL outside (just guessing though)?
Back to top
Profile PM 
msuho Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: Oct. 2004
Posted: Oct. 26 2004,03:22 QUOTE

I wanted to fllow up on this thread, as so many folks gave me good ideas.

I got an updated AMIBIOS BIOS for my motherboard from eSupport, with large drive support (yeah, actually paid $$$ for it) . I flashed the BIOS, and tried again. fdisk still does recognized existing partitions or the partition table, nor will it let me write changes if I try to create them all from scratch.
I've screwed around with this for almost a week- I admit defeat.

A curious aside- I mentioned in a previous post that I had the same proble with Knoppix 3.3. Well, I tried Knoppix 3.6 over the weekend- the fdisk & knoppix-install scripts worked fine on this box. But it's way more that I want.

I still am using DSL on two other machines (I boot off a USB stick on one, have it installed on the HD on the other), so I'm not giving it up- I just wanted to stick to one distibution on all my boxes.

Thanks again, guys-

Mark
Back to top
Profile PM 
18 replies since Oct. 19 2004,21:51 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (4) </ 1 2 [3] 4 >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: fdisk/cfdisk probs w/large drives?

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code