beagan
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: May 2005 |
|
Posted: May 27 2005,20:47 |
|
DSL looks like the perfect distro for an old system being pressed back into service, but installation keeps failing. This machine has two hard drives, hda holding the old Windows system and hdc used to hold an old Red Hat (5? 6? 7?) system. I attempted to install SusE on the machine, but that was too heavyweight for this old box. DSL from LiveCD worked great, so I thought I'd install.
SusE had partitioned the drive into hdc1 - /boot, hdc2 - / and hdc3 swap. All attempts to install on hdc2 failed. I have now merged hdc1 and hdc2 into hdc1 (Primary, Boot), and am at the point where problems showed up before. I've booted from CD and just run dsl-hdinstall, which ran mkliloboot. In the process it reported the following:
... Do you want to run mkliloboot now? (y/...) y mount: dev/hdc1 already mounted or /mnt/hd busy mount: according to mtab, /dev/hdc1 is already mounted on /mnt/hd /dev/root on / type ext2 (rw) /dev/scd0 on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro) /dev/cloop on /KNOPPIX type iso9660 (ro) /ramdisk on /ramdisk type tmpfs (rw,size=44608k) /proc/bus/usb on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw,devmode=0666) /dev/hdc1 on /mnt/hd type ext2 (rw) Setting up boot loader (LILO) in the master boot record... part: /dev/hda1, typ: 11 Warning: '/proc/partitions' does not exist, disk scan bypassed Warning: /dev/hdc is not on the first disk Added Linux * Skipping vmlinuz.old Added Windows(hda1) }The lilo boot installation process is finished. You must reboot...
The first pair of warnings from "mount:" is troubling but the system seems to have recovered. The second pair, though...
I don't know anything about /proc/partitions (yet). Perhaps I need to create that?
And the second warning, that hdc is not on the first disk... I don't understand. I had LILO on this machine originally, until SuSE replaced it with its loader. But when the machine boots up it still has the SuSE loader. Perhaps LILO is being written to the wrong drive?
Rebooting...
Well, a change. Now it comes up with GNU Grub 0.94, and a prompt: grub>
That's it. If I tell it to boot, it tells me the kernel must be loaded before booting.
Slowly sliding backwards... what am I doing wrong? Or what is it I need to do differently so it is right?
|