mikshaw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ce47/3ce47e985ab15a24d340f7ee67fb1117182cdde6" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 27 2005,02:39 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I'm gonna climb out on a limb and say it ain't DSL's fault. The Macromedia Flash plugin for Linux has always been rather poor, particularly with keeping audio and video in sync. Version 7 has improved, but it's still far behind the performance you'd get with the Windows version.
However, a lot of it may be your processor. Flash is a CPU hog, and the slower your processor the worse it will perform. A lot of the Flash stuff developed these days will barely run on anything less than 400-500mhz
-------------- http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
|