lagerratrobe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: Dec. 2005 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: May 09 2006,15:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Ok, I think I've found the winning combo for now. Forum member "multitudes" had posted an entry in the "Ideas and Suggestions" section which pertains to the kernel mismatch I encountered last night. http://damnsmalllinux.org/cgi-bin....titudes
Looks like using DSL 2.1b and the ipw2200-k2.4.31.dsl is the way to go, it seems to work beautifully. I like this solution much better than using ndiswrapper, so I'm going to stick with it.
DSL-N looks pretty cool, new kernel and all, but I'm not into the Frugal installs. I still prefer an HD install of DSL for its lightning fast response, and ease of administration. I know how unpopular that is here, so I won;t say anything more on the topic.
Very glad to have found a combination that works. I *almost* was going to have to ditch DSL. Very glad I didn't have to.
|