bartgrefte
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: April 09 2007,16:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Hi,
I just read a lot about clients with MSN Messenger behind a iptables-/NAT-router. In short everything I read goes like this: MSN Messenger doesn't work completely behind a iptables/NAT-router because MSN uses mostly dynamic ports for everything accept the text-chatting itself. So I mean audio/video communication, filetransfers etc...
But, the sites and (mostly tweakers.net)topics I found where from béfore 2005.
So.... is this problem solved by now??
While writing this something just popped In my head... UPnP (Universal Plug 'n' Pray) should be a sollution to this problem, but is this possible in combination with iptables?
With regards, Bart Grefte
|