Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: What sort of install to use on low-mem old laptop?, Frugal or HD?  And why?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
daldred Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: Jan. 04 2007,21:09 QUOTE

I have an old Libretto 50CT - 75MHz processor, 32Mb memory, HDD upgraded to 6Gb of which I keep a Win98 installation on 2Gb.  The rest of the drive is available for Linux.

At present I have a DSL installation dating back to March 06, when I did a HD install (using loadlin from DOS to get the installation started - the Libretto has no CD drive).

I've also installed the XAMPP apache/mysql/php system on the machine for use when developing websites.  It takes ages to start XAMPP on this small a machine, but once it's going it's quite fast enough.

With 3.2 appearing over the horizon, it's time to upgrade: but I'm not certain what form of installation to use.   There seems to be a lot of positive comment about Frugal compared with HD, but I'm far from clear whether this would work in a low-memory environment.  MyDSL extensions are said to need more memory, but the later versions can apparently be put on HD to save RAM.

What I want is DSL, with (in some way) a webserver which can deal with PHP files and some form of database (doesn't have to be MySQL - SQLite can be persuaded to emulate it closely enough for my purposes if necessary).

Since I generally boot to Linux rather than Windows, I want it to start from LILO / Grub or whatever on startup, not go through a Windows boot first!

Do I need to do what I did before (install to HD, ignore MyDSL ideas, install XAMPP), or is there a better (or at least 'purer DSL') way to do it?
Back to top
Profile PM 
hs7sv Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: June 2005
Posted: Jan. 05 2007,03:47 QUOTE

This thread may help you.  :D

--------------
"My advice is to just  return hardware that does not work with a plain Linux kernel, right to the place where you bought it, and ask for your money back..."

Klaus Knopper
Back to top
Profile PM ICQ AOL MSN YIM 
daldred Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: Jan. 05 2007,17:38 QUOTE

Quote (hs7sv @ Jan. 04 2007,22:47)
This thread may help you.  :D

Helps a bit - clearly frugal can do what's needed!  But the issue is really whether the memory limitation is going to be a problem for Frugal - 32Mb is as much as the Libretto will take, and if Frugal needs more memory to load extensions it could be better to use a HD install again.  

Any thoughts?
Back to top
Profile PM 
crawler Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: Jan. 2007
Posted: Jan. 05 2007,20:19 QUOTE

I use old 133MHz Notebook, DSL works smooth. 75MHz might be a little bit to slow to manage all daemons etc., whats about slackware or derivates? Or is a graphical user interface a "must have"?
Back to top
Profile PM 
daldred Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: Jan. 05 2007,22:06 QUOTE

Quote (crawler @ Jan. 05 2007,15:19)
I use old 133MHz Notebook, DSL works smooth. 75MHz might be a little bit to slow to manage all daemons etc., whats about slackware or derivates? Or is a graphical user interface a "must have"?

I've tried Slackware, but there are just too many things it doesn't do - it failed to handle the Libretto's hibernation and the rather odd PCMCIA floppy, for instance.  DSL is happy with both.

The question isn't really whether or how to load DSL, but what installation type to use.  

I think I'm going to try a Frugal based on 3.1 - that should make it easy to upgrade to 3.2 when its out (from what I've read) and if frugal turns out not to be ideal I can simply revert to an HD install when 3.2 time comes around.
Back to top
Profile PM 
5 replies since Jan. 04 2007,21:09 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: What sort of install to use on low-mem old laptop?

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code