lucky13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Feb. 14 2007,16:25 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote (hs7sv @ Feb. 14 2007,02:13) | My laptop is running at its slowest speed on DSL also.... |
Are you making apple-to-apple comparisons running the same applications under the same window manager, etc.? It figures your laptop would run a lot "slower" under DSL because DSL doesn't have the same overhead that a larger distro like SuSE has. That will account for a lot of difference. All it means is that you can run DSL longer per battery charge than SuSE or whatever else runs your CPU full steam.
I don't understand why some of you seem to consider it a "problem" that your CPU speed varies according to the demands placed on it by an operating system and the applications being run. I consider that a benefit regardless of what I'm running, especially if I need more than a couple hours between plugging it in.
-------------- "It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end." -- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
|