Hi. Since a lot time ago a was hoping a distro like knoopix but smaller, and very very smaller with only the essential programs to work with and without X, with hardware detection, and all the stuff to configure the essential parts. With let to other users make his own pseudo-distros just adding programs and just worry for this programs.
I think that almost all is in dsl, and i'm very happy for that.
I just want to ask if the hardware detection is the native from knoopix or is your own program and if it is updated periodically. Thats becouse i dont know nothing about hardware detection at this time, i just know what programs i want to my personal live CD.
This is a great job and becouse i'm an student i dont work and i dont have money to donate but, when i start to work i will give to you my special thanks
bye.
PD: Sorry for my englishThe current version of DSL is based upon knoppix 3.4 5-17-2004 version.
It contains most of the knoppix hardware detection.
Usually the hardware detection is automatically upgraded when the DSL team decides to move to a new knoppix base system.
For example,
DSL 0.? to 0.5.31 = based on KNOPPIX 3.2 DSL 0.6 to 0.7.3 = based on KNOPPIX 3.3 DSL 0.8 to 1.0.1 = based on KNOPPIX 3.4
DSL User "tronik" has created a custom unofficial remaster that uses the 2.4.27 kernel with full SATA controller support.
Otherwise, it is do-it-yourself time or wait for the next major update from the team.
Even so, it appears that a crossroads will be reached because knoppix is switching to the 2.6.x kernel and it will no longer be possible to update the 2.4.x based DSL project from anything newer than knoppix 3.7 unless DSL itself switches to the 2.6.x kernel
Quote
unless DSL itself switches to the 2.6.x kernel
Sorry if this is a dumb question but I'm fairly new to linux Why not switch, is this a compatibilty issue or is this kernel not as stable ReallyI'm just curious cause I'm running a Knoppix install with boot options for both (no noticable difference in stability here but I have no idea what the changes are, so I'm off to look ) My guess is the 2.6 kernel is too large....could be stability issues as well.Supposedly, the 2.6.x kernel abandons support for some older "legacy" hardware but I don't know the details or the extent.
This puts the distro maintainer into a difficult position. Does he use 2.4.x and lose support for newer hardware that was not backported to 2.4.x or does he use 2.6.x and abandon support for some selected older hardware?
At this point, 2.4.30 is still good enough for many mainstream distros to use it so it is a issue to be addressed in the future.Next Page...
original here.
