Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic

Question: word processors :: Total Votes:8
Poll choices Votes Statistics
Ted-gtk 4  [50.00%]
Pathetic Writer 1  [12.50%]
flwriter 3  [37.50%]
Guests cannot vote
Pages: (5) </ [1] 2 3 4 5 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: word processors< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
John Offline





Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 697
Joined: Sep. 2003
Posted: Jan. 24 2005,07:14 QUOTE

Okay, here are the choices.

Ted-gtk
Pathetic Writer
flwriter


Out of the three I am leaning towards flwriter.  It has less features than Pathetic Writer, and it doesn't look as sexy, but it seems a lot less buggy.

Cast your votes, and please give me your reasoning.

Here are the reasons why I am leaning towards flwriter:
It doesn't crash when I change font size
Has a working copy and paste.
Can export to RTF, can also import from RTF with small a addon.
Can be used as a wysiwyg xhtml editor as well as a simple word processor.
Spell Check.
It really is fast and light.

Please try all three apps if you can before you vote.
Back to top
Profile PM 
rossjman1 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 69
Joined: Oct. 2004
Posted: Jan. 24 2005,20:27 QUOTE

Is this for a new version of DSL?
Back to top
Profile PM AOL 
SaidinUnleashed Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mar. 2004
Posted: Jan. 24 2005,21:41 QUOTE

Quote (rossjman1 @ Jan. 24 2005,14:27)
Is this for a new version of DSL?

Arr.. yer comperhension skills be farr exceedin' that of this old sea man.


Definately not Ted, PW is better than that old hulk.

But, PW, she is a leaky, half worm eaten ship.

FLwriter is not bad at all. Though it is a little light on the sex appeal, if ye know what I be meanin' there matey.

Let's try Flwriter.

Scite! Scite! Scite!

-J.P.


--------------
They say if you play a Microsoft CD backwards, you hear satanic messages. That's nothing, cause if you play it forwards, it installs Windows.

Unleash the power of the TILDE~~~
Back to top
Profile PM AOL MSN YIM 
Bidi Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: Nov. 2004
Posted: Jan. 24 2005,22:31 QUOTE

Pathetic is definetly the worst of the 3, in my opinion, just for the fact that it crashes like a 5 year old on bumper cars.

Don't really like Ted, just because...

So I voted for flwriter.
Back to top
Profile PM 
wetterau Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 38
Joined: July 2004
Posted: Jan. 24 2005,23:45 QUOTE

Warning: long winded.
DSL is excellent--a basic system usable on a wide range of hardware and easily enhanced to satisfy individual preferences. Word processors have two tasks: text entry/editing and document preparation. Text editing (writing, programming) is verbal and symbolic; document preparation is visual. It is hard to make a single interface that works optimally for both tasks. A GUI that allows quick access to margin adjustments, font changes, bulleted lists, image inclusion, headers and footers, etc. is going to be cluttered with choices irrelevant to a writer or programmer working on a project. A keyboard interface that is fast, powerful, and visually clean will be much harder to use for visual work.

For light text editing, Beaver works well. For professional text editing, Vim (or the full GVim with documentation (thanks, mikShaw)) is the best there is, in my view. For medium duty document preparation, Abiword works and is improving. For heavy duty document work, ooWriter is excellent. The .cli packaging of ooWriter is terrific. Most people who have a lot of document preparation to do and who must interact continuously with Microsoft Word/Office users will put up with oo's long opening time. Both Abiword and ooWriter have the usual mouse oriented entry/editing routines, not as good as Vim/GVim, but good enough for those who are not primarily writing or programming.

The choice for a light duty word processor is hard. Pathetic Writer is useless in its present state. Ted is fast and has the advantage of writing .rtf files that can be read as is by Windows/Word users. The other direction doesn't work as well because Word users must save their document as .rtf in order for Ted to be able to read it. Ted needs antiword or another .doc to .rtf converter to be really useful in these situations. Ted is almost too good for a light word processor. When you start needing all of its capabilities, you might just as well use ooWriter which has just about everything you could want.

I haven't used flwriter, but the interface is appealing. If it isn't crash prone and if it works for international users who have their own fonts, right to left entry, etc., I'd vote for it. Most likely, anyone who has to interact with Microsoft document formats is going to use ooWriter anyway. If I could have only one small word processor, I'd probably choose Ted. Given Abiword and ooWriter in reserve, I'd choose flwriter (if it's stable).

All that said, I use GVim for writing and ooWriter for document preparation. When I need top of the line presentation, I use a Windows box and the Adobe tools, PageMaker, Indesign, and Photoshop.
Back to top
Profile PM 
23 replies since Jan. 24 2005,07:14 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (5) </ [1] 2 3 4 5 >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: word processors

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code