beakmyn
Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: Sep. 2004 |
|
Posted: May 16 2007,13:44 |
|
Quote (mikshaw @ May 16 2007,09:25) | The only thing that might present a problem is the auto mount part. I still don't understand why people want this behavior so badly, but I guess that's a matter of opinion.
The first thing I'd suggest is searching these forums. There have been a number of DSL picture frame projects done, and I can remember at least one thread that was almost identical to this one several months ago. |
It was probably my project since I keep asking questions about it, and I don't believe anyone else has taken it as far as I have.
I understand your concerns about automount (I've read the posts) and I agree in a typical deployment there's no need for it. However, this is a specific case where the system has no mouse or hard-drive and I can't very explain to "mom and dad" how to vnc into the frame and mount, copy, etc the pictures over. It needs to be easy for them. I am aware that it will see the device on bootup but I'd rather not have to make them shut it down and reboot in order to add new pictures (I have that script on my site). I hoping to make it as simple as they plug it in and it copies their pictures over and then gives some indication of progress, without rebooting.
My scripting abilities are sub-par at best. My thought is that automount would use far less system resources then anything I could write. I would cobble something together that would constantly poll the /dev and chew up what little RAM I have.
I'm more or less looking for someone to say the 'concept' is sound but you may have a problem with this or that and might I suggest you look into....
-------------- Have you seen my Damn Small Digital Picture frame? http://www.frontiernet.net/~pictureframe http://rapidshare.com/files/27769266/pframedsl.iso.html http://www.joyceandkevin.com/dslpictureframe/pframedsl.rar
|